May be the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?
Puff Bar is an excellent alternative to a normal ice cream treat since it has none of the cons associated with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, which makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it’s a healthy alternative for those who are watching their diet. In addition to that, Puff Bar is easy to make, you can make it normally as you want and never have to prepare the ice cream each time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.
Puff Bar is a relatively new product, which was developed to test people reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. Whenever we smoke we have been exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers claim that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the primary issues in public health today is obesity and diet. For this reason many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these brilliant products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers podsmall.com of Puff Bar declare that individuals who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so when they only need to carry around the small product. The makers of Puff Bar are aware that since public health officials have already been calling to find out more on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the public wants to know more about Puff Bar and whether it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In line with the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert which allows you to put it into your mouth, which means that you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to go on it where ever you may go. If the product also has an extinguisher additionally it is in violation of regulations. The reason being that since there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to utilize to refill a preexisting e cigarette with nicotine or even to smoke a different one.
Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a way that is illegal. Besides sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the business’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team did isn’t entirely surprising. The issue with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in regulations. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that might be filed by municipalities that wanted to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting type of tobacco into the marketplace.
In addition to the possibility of a lawsuit being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes out there could result in a reduction in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are offered non-tobacco flavored e-cigs are more likely to replace those cigarettes with the ones that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to younger generations, this could substantially decrease the number of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. Also it seems that the addition of the puff bar to several tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes could lead smokers to search out “real” cigarettes and not rely so heavily on an alternative solution that may not supply them with nicotine.
It appears that the UK government may have a point. There is currently no requirement for tobacco companies to include warning labels on the products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The only thing that these products all have in common is that they will not cause cancer or other diseases. It appears to be a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution just like the puff bar would seem such as a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they are essentially creating products that are more difficult to consume, which means that fewer people will purchase them.